User talk:Sir Gemerald Bleu: Difference between revisions
Gem Control (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2024-03-30 at 00-11-16 New vausherald on b https boards.4chan.org b thread 916106779Post some bait with jaks to get 4cuckers uppity.png|thumb|right|Source]] | |||
[[File:Kneeling.png|thumb| <Forced 'nish (troongeleno says the wiki needs more 'oy'peak) <br>(me on the left)--[[User:Notanamefag|Notanamefag]] ([[User talk:Notanamefag|talk]]) 08:07, 9 September 2023 (EST)]] | [[File:Kneeling.png|thumb| <Forced 'nish (troongeleno says the wiki needs more 'oy'peak) <br>(me on the left)--[[User:Notanamefag|Notanamefag]] ([[User talk:Notanamefag|talk]]) 08:07, 9 September 2023 (EST)]] | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
== Flooding reports == | == Flooding reports == | ||
I saw your post on the 'farm where you showed off how you like to report posts on /q/ en masse for being off-topic. Since I don't have a 'farm account I'm just gonna reply here. Report flooding is a retarded thing to do, because if somebody uploads actual rule-breaking material like 'p, and someone sends in a report, the janny wont see it because of the mass influx of signed reports from /q/ which you deem to be off topic. And considering Froot said the jannies ignore your reports anyways, I see no reason in making a janny's 0$ per hour job any more difficult than it has to be by making it harder for them to remove actual rule-breaking crap. | I saw your post on the 'farm where you showed off how you like to report posts on /q/ en masse for being off-topic. Since I don't have a 'farm account I'm just gonna reply here. Report flooding is a retarded thing to do, because if somebody uploads actual rule-breaking material like 'p, and someone sends in a report, the janny wont see it because of the mass influx of signed reports from /q/ which you deem to be off topic. And considering Froot said the jannies ignore your reports anyways, I see no reason in making a janny's 0$ per hour job any more difficult than it has to be by making it harder for them to remove actual rule-breaking crap. | ||
{{quote|No nametrooning on the 'iki on my watch}} Even doe i made the first vaush thread you selfish little god + you didnt even add anything page + I was there raiding for 6 hours + You have no Rizz | |||
[[File:Screenshot 2024-03-30 at 02-08-21 New vausherald on b https boards.4chan.org b thread 916106779Post some bait with jaks to get 4cuckers uppity.png|thumb|right|Source]] |
Revision as of 08:02, 30 March 2024
Soyspeak.
Is there any way I could talk with you in private?
Sure, even though I don't know if the Wiki has a PM feature or something or whatever. What do you suggest?
Flooding reports
I saw your post on the 'farm where you showed off how you like to report posts on /q/ en masse for being off-topic. Since I don't have a 'farm account I'm just gonna reply here. Report flooding is a retarded thing to do, because if somebody uploads actual rule-breaking material like 'p, and someone sends in a report, the janny wont see it because of the mass influx of signed reports from /q/ which you deem to be off topic. And considering Froot said the jannies ignore your reports anyways, I see no reason in making a janny's 0$ per hour job any more difficult than it has to be by making it harder for them to remove actual rule-breaking crap.
No nametrooning on the 'iki on my watch Even doe i made the first vaush thread you selfish little god + you didnt even add anything page + I was there raiding for 6 hours + You have no Rizz